Service of Magharebia
By: Monia Ferjani

The decision of the Tunisian government to lower the voting age from 20 to 18 reflects a deep awareness of the requirements of the current phase. Unlike several neighboring countries, the Tunisian society is a young one, as shown by its population pyramid. According to the statistics of the year 2008, the age group ranging between 15 and 64 represents 69.7% of the total population of the country, people under 15 years of age represent 23.93%, while those over 65 years represent only 7%. Therefore, the importance of young people should not be underestimated.
Young people nowadays live the information revolution and follow it in great detail, and even master the use of communication technologies. This youth can no longer be ousted.
The effect of lowering the voting age on the presidential and legislative elections next October 2009 is another issue that won’t be clarified until we raise two questions that are extremely important and vital.
Firstly: Which youth are targeted by this amendment? Is it the constitutional and trained youth, who are prepared for the elections according to the options and directions of their party, or the opposition youth who reject the reality of the country’s politics, economy and social situation, or the Tunisian youth in general? Is it the educated youth, averagely educated youth, or school dropouts? Is it the satisfied and content youth or those seeking immigration by all means possible, legal or not? Is it the working or the unemployed youth?
If the constitutional youth is the target of this law in order to ensure a higher turnout, then the government will neglect the opposition youth, even if they do not belong to a particular opposition party. This category may surprise everyone and tip the balance leading to results that the government didn’t expect by passing this law.
Secondly: Has this legal procedure of lowering the voting age come in response to popular demand by the youth, or was it a dictated law without any claim?
If it came in response to popular demand, and the country has not experienced a youth movement of this kind and in this direction, it was probably a recommendation of a committee resulting from one of the ruling party’s seminars, and in this case the proposal does not represent the desire of all Tunisian youth.
And if the law was dictated without any claim, then it’s a preventive measure to address the low turnout that most third world governments suffer from, especially those with a non-changing political scene. History has shown that dictated laws are not as well-received as those that are the result of a bitter struggle.
In any case, I’m not expecting a direct and significant impact of this law on the forthcoming elections, not to mention that people aged between 18 and 20 are young students who are barely out of high school. Everyone knows that this period of one’s life is characterized by rejection of all authority and state institutions; therefore I do not think that the lowering of the voting age will change much or affect the presidential and legislative elections next October 2009.
Your Comments
commentsAnonymous About over 2 years ago
I agree with you that this law did not come in response to popular demand. The Tunisian people does not even want elections, because it’s convinced that they are shameless farce and cheat. Besides, the election results are a foregone conclusion: the President, with all his magnanimity, has already decreed the number of seats to be given to the puppets that he baptized as being the “opposition”, way before the “elections”.
The majority will be formed by other puppets from the Democratic Constitutional Rally which applauds every time that the President violates the constitution or steps over democracy with his military boots. I also agree with you that lowering the voting age will have no impact on the “elections”. Their value has been lowered and will enable the Architect of Change to score a majority and make Stalin and Brezhnev turn over in their graves out of jealousy. But not Saddam who had scored 100%.
Our Architect would love to score as high, but in order to steer clear of a quarrel with his Western protectors, he must control his eagerness. Besides, I would like to point out that for the 2004 elections, he lowered (this word is in vogue) his popularity from 99.1% to 94.49%. This devaluation was intended to exhibit his democratic penchant to President Bush who had held a breakfast in his honor at the White House. During this ceremony, Bush asked him at a press conference to release his grip on the country in order to allow the voices of the opposition and the press to be heard. To please Bush, Ben Ali has devalued his popularity by almost 5%. How much will he still devalue to please Obama? He could be more creative by granting voting rights to babies without omitting to have the dead vote as well.
Report Abuse