Calling for boycott is mere resignation

Monia By: Monia Ferjani

111123-zawayaphoto1

They entered a fancy, foreign restaurant and sat down. They checked the menu but couldn’t understand it due to the language barrier. The man said to his girlfriend: Choose the most expensive dish, it must be the best. The woman pointed to the most expensive item on the menu and showed it to the waiter, and the man nodded, asking for the same order. After a while, the waiter brought their food and told them in a language they could understand: “Here is what you ordered: Bread.”

Bread? Yes, bread. Bread alone, at the highest price.

This is what happens to those who go to places where people speak a language they don’t understand, think that wealth replaces culture, ignore communication with others, and only master shiny appearances. That will be our fate if we remain content with the only knowledge we memorized years ago, without learning new things and speaking a new language to engage in dialogue and deal with the revolution’s developments and requirements, such as accepting others despite their differences. Our minds have been domesticated for over fifty years, so we got used to a single leader, party, media and culture. We are used to others thinking on our behalf, finding solutions for us – while they are the ones who originally caused the problem -, speaking on our behalf, seeing with our eyes, and electing themselves to represent us.

That is why we revolted. To exist, freely express our opinions, and make our own choices. Should we leave things as they are after people sacrificed their lives? Should we desperately bury our heads in the sand and surrender to the idea that nothing will change whether we voted or not? Will change fall from heaven? Should we sit like usual and wait for a miracle? Or maybe we want a Utopia where life is pleasant without sacrifices?

I registered on the electoral roll, and so did my family, neighbors and friends. We registered despite everything: the momentum of the parties and their unconvincing speeches; the lack of security and the arsons; the continued media support for the existing regime; the high cost of living, the deteriorating purchasing power, and the declining investment; the monopoly, exploitation, and unemployment; the paper heroes, violence and provocation… We registered despite all that and many other reasons.

Refraining from voting is a negative attitude that means nothing but resignation. Negativity doesn’t build countries. As a consequence, we will be left with bread alone at the highest price.

I contributed with this article to a blogging campaign organized by Tunisian bloggers to encourage citizens to vote, supported by a parallel campaign on Facebook, and the efforts made by several actors of civil society, namely political parties, organizations, associations, the media, and different ministries and public institutions who put up advertising boards…

I believe that calling to boycott the polls is a weak and negative attitude, no matter how shaken the people’s trust is in the honesty of their governments and the integrity of the elections. Voting remains the most noble form of free expression, and it’s a right before being a duty, aiming to hinder anyone who attempts to impose tutelage on the people’s will.

Your Comments

comments

Anonymous About 5 months ago

logical reasoning

comments

Anonymous About 5 months ago

Since the ministry of the interior decides about the final results of the elections, then what’s the use of voting or even registering on electoral rolls?

comments

بن نعوم ابراهيم About 5 months ago

It is true that the call to forsake common duties to practice patriotism classifies as selfishness. And ignoring someone else because he is losing hope in people and because his life is not in order leads others into taking risks and pushes on those who don’t wish to move. They indulge in their governance and authority and hate to give it up. They consider it as a God-given right that cannot be taken under any circumstance. I am still astonished by the proponents of freedom and justice in life. How can they refuse freedom of speech when they themselves practice it and are happy with its great benefits? The few who are closed minded don’t have peace of mind, and they aren’t comfortable with their life’s path because they are not connected with their people, who derive their value from the roots of their history, which is has great influence. He refuses free democracy and he stands with those who boycott freedom because they don’t have the abilities needed for success and survival. There is nothing left for them but crying and shouting after the morning, and there is nothing to look forward to except counting toward the end of one era and the beginning of another. Since we were born we have been familiar with the only face, the only thought and the only flowery speech until we believed in what we had and we were convinced and we believed in the uniqueness of the eternal governor. The one and only whom everyone follows and no one can challenge until we becae a flock of birds that are nesting in the corridors of fear and are mating in the ways of fear and terror from the governor.. The salt became ours and the food is for them, the speech is for them and the opinion is for them, for them, for them, and the command is entirely theirs. They gave birth to phantoms, the passersby and the followers. They created systems for themselves that they call sects that are like pastures that take good things. There is no possibility for it to stay in the era of the unjust governor.

Other Opinions

News from Magharebia