Service of Magharebia
By: Adel Rochdy

Arab revolutions have significantly changed the future prospects of Arab peoples who are about to fully embrace the era of democracy, characterized by a real multiparty system and elections that will most probably be transparent.
Terrorism that had been a definite threat seems to be declining, because it was caught off guard by the successive revolutions that are shaking Africa and the Arab world.
Not too long ago, al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) was described by the regimes in power as a major destabilizing force that nobody could control or eradicate except for the existing dictatorial regimes.
Leaders resorted to this recurrent blackmail to perpetuate their grip on society.
For their part, terrorist groups thought that they had a bright future ahead of them, given the disastrous economic, social and international conditions of the poor populations.
Terrorists are caught on the hop by the Arab uprisings, and no longer have a reason to “take in charge” the anger of the peoples who regained their freedom, and hope about the future.
In this context, the implementation of job creation programmes by the Malian government is all the more significant.
Mali is suffering from serious social and economic deficiencies. Like many African countries, Mali couldn’t achieve development even fifty years after its independence. Therefore, it is absolutely vital that the country implements a serious development policy.
In Mali, the elections were more or less democratic, and the press enjoys relatively more freedom compared to other Maghreb regimes prior to the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions and the major demonstrations in Morocco and Algeria; but that’s not enough. Mali should follow the example of Arab countries that clearly aspire to breaking with absolutism and paving the way for a truly democratic society, without necessarily resorting to violence.
Employment policies alone are not enough to end the inclination of young people to take up armed struggle and embrace radical Islam. Political movements and parties, and civil society representatives, have to get involved in a consensual legal framework regulating their activities through free expression and the culture of difference.
AQIM has chosen to operate in Mali because this sub-Saharan African country is an ideal location that’s difficult to monitor.
This organization shouldn’t be attacked on the military level only, but also on the ground where it recruits and indoctrinates militants.
Terrorism will possibly still remain for a while, but it will inevitably fade away if African countries initiate a development policy based on a better exploitation of their underground and agricultural wealth.
Today, the vast majority of political actors seem to agree on building a democratic society and sharing wealth, after the three successful revolutions that overthrew the dictators in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and will probably do the same in Yemen and Syria. This has a good chance to become a model for all poor countries.
The Malian government is very late in realizing the importance… more
Sahel leaders finally realized that security in this vast desert… more
Experience from around the world has demonstrated that a security-based… more
Your Comments
commentsالشيخ 94 About 8 months ago
What did revolutions provide the Arab man with? The most prominent result is undoubtedly the thousands of victims that exceeded 30 thousands in Libya, & the chaos, uncontrollable security that seem to be irreparable in Tunisia, and the rights & crimes in Egypt that have no clear cut way yet as to how they shall be settled. The persistent apprehension to go back to the past era is still there in Egypt & Tunisia. There is this mutual grudge, and hatred among two big sectors of the people whether in Egypt or Tunisia, due to the stand of each towards the revolution whether anti- or pro-revolution. Added to this, the phenomenon of exclusion adopted by the revolutionaries versus their adversaries, although those are citizens who are not less loyal to the nation, as well as they are not a minority that can be neutralized. Although the revolutions against the autocratic regimes are justified, the way by which revolutions took place is not encouraging. It is rather better if rulers understand the demands of peoples, and save them the blood-baths. Unfortunately we have not changed, and we do not seem to be changing in the near future. The half-revolutions that we have done are no more than experiments that we have performed in our wrong ways. I do not think that it will yield anything in future, if things remain the same as they are now. Regarding terrorist groups, it is far away; the public expelled them, and replaced them by the half-revolutions that have been encouraged since the beginning of the year. These groups have become a part of a bad history through which the Arabs have passed. The death of Bin Laden that coincided with the surge of the Arab half revolutions, was a stark sign from fate that this chapter of this non-religious group has been irrevocably closed, after being abandoned finally by the peoples who revolted peacefully at least at the start.
Report Abuse