Is deterrence a solution?

Monia By: Monia Ferjani

100526-zawaya-photo

Students, parents, and supervisors are all becoming increasingly worried with the approaching dates of the baccalaureate examinations in the Maghreb, due to the spread of cheating practices year after year. These malpractices take different forms and use innovative methods mirroring the developments of communication technologies. Actually, cheating in exams is an old phenomenon that used to be rare as it was limited to students with weak results and levels. In recent years, however, cheating in exams has spread remarkably, flouting the students’ efforts to maintain academic integrity and rely only on their intellectual and cognitive abilities.

Despite all the efforts deployed and measures of precaution undertaken by the Maghreb Ministries of Education, the phenomenon of cheating has been worsening and taking on new and dangerous forms, by using traditional methods as well as modern ones, such as Bluetooth, text messaging via mobile phones, and audio recordings of lessons on MP3 players and iPods.

The Tunisian Ministry of Education announced 385 cheats caught during the baccalaureate examinations of last year. The penalties ranged from failing the student to banning them from taking the baccalaureate exams for a period of five years.

For this year’s session, the Ministry has approved a number of new measures to deal with cheating in exams, at the top of which comes an agreement with mobile network providers in order to fully jam phone calls inside examination halls by isolating the examination rooms from the telephone networks. This jamming measure will cover about 500 examination halls by putting them out of the coverage area during exam days.

This jamming measure will be accompanied by an awareness campaign to alert students about the seriousness of fraud and the repercussions that it can lead to. Very strict measures will also be taken to limit students out of the exam rooms to smoke or go to the toilet. Moreover, calculators that are not licensed by the Institute’s administration will not be authorized for use at the exam. Examination supervisors should also check the students’ tools and keep an eye on their behaviors during the exam session.

Are all these measures sufficient to cut down on cheating?

Aren’t these measures a pre-recognition of the students offense and showing poor faith in them before they even do anything wrong?

Is the role of the concerned authorities to provide a suitable environment to take the examinations, or to put pressure on students and show them a lack of confidence in their integrity?

Wouldn’t that have a negative effect on the students’ performance and results and how they deal with studies?

I think it’s not rational to tackle the issue of cheating during the exam only when its date is approaching at the end of each year. I believe that it would be more effective to have a program founded on sound components all year long, involving teachers, parents and educational psychologists. There should also be meetings and activities for students in order to establish new study habits that give knowledge its true value, and repulse them from the mentality of dependency and lack of self-confidence. I also call on the Ministries of Education in the Great Maghreb, especially the examinations departments, to revolutionize the exams contents, in a way that will encourage students to deeply think and analyze, instead of automatically reciting information; that way, cheating will be rendered really difficult.

Your Comments

comments

Anonymous About about 1 year ago

One of the reasons behind cheating in exams is the general atmosphere regarding the level of diplomas, and the lack of stable and guaranteed jobs. Everyone is responsible, starting from professors, to directors and educational delegations and academies, where there is competition on national ranks, success rates, first grades, etc. The exacerbation of the phenomenon of cheating has started since the change in the baccalaureate system, with the introduction of the semesters’ system, and insisting on making it successful. I was surprised when a student told me that an official in a committee composed of members of the educational delegation, academy, and prefecture caught him in possession of a notebook from which he was copying, so the official scolded him and took the notebook… without taking any action against the student… Some officials encourage ignoring things that happens in the exam rooms, for the latter to turn into beehives, with lots of cheating belts and straps… Things might even reach the extent of having the teacher in charge of supervising students dictate on them the answers of some, or all, questions. Sometimes the tumult increases, and everything gets forgotten, and the teachers who refuse to help students cheat become the enemies of students. Therefore, the phenomenon of cheating is spreading and has become a win-win situation for all, as well as a rule, and the opposite became the exception… Imagine the following situation: A teacher known for his integrity hears obscenities when entering an examination room, or students pray and read Quran hoping that he will not be among the supervisors… Even if a cheating case was caught, and one of the persons in charge of guarding students wanted to do their job, that would be almost impossible, for the institution not to be classified as suspicious… Officials in delegations and academies call on directors to act with wisdom; and wisdom means not recording any violations against the institution (cheating, fights, insults, abuse…). Imagine the paradox: The director of a secondary school, who is doing his job, reporting absenteeism among students and teachers, and early dropouts from school, received a warning from the director of the delegation at the end of the school year… Whereas another director, in the same region, has a lot of absenteeism among students and teachers, before and after vacations, besides dropping out of school before the end of the school year, doesn’t receive anything… When the director who received a warning asked for an explanation, he was told that the best person in the eyes of the delegation is the one who does not report anything (bad) to them (the policy of pretending that everything is alright).

Other Opinions

News from Magharebia